I just ran across this quote as I was catching up with the news after work:
“Most people reading through that transcript are not going to find that extremely compelling cause to throw out a president that won an election in 2016,”
Wow! That’s pretty direct. Take that, Democrats. This is just sour grapes on your part. Was that from current Trump sycophant Lindsey (Huckleberry Hypocrite) Graham? Perhaps it was John (Concern Troll) Cornyn or even Matt (I can’t control my mouth) Gaetz. Heck, any Republican would be proud to utter those words, even Susan (I really am a “reasonable” Republican) Collins. Could it have been an implicated administration official like Pompeo or Pence of even Barr? Guess again.
Why it’s Tulsi Gabbard! This time eschewing FOX “News” for more civil, if no less right wing climes. Apparently she is so very concerned about “hyperpartisan divides” that she’s fine with whatever laws Trump wants to break. Heck, he was elected, right? He paid good money for that election and so what if none of it was his? So no worries, Herr Gropenfuhrer! Tulsi’s got your back. As long as you don’t eat babies or ban conversion therapy, you’ll get nothing but strong defense from her.
Seriously though, that informal injunction against trashing Democratic candidates? Yeah, I’m not feeling it in this case. I don’t care if she did qualify for an October debate, I don’t care that she has a dedicated following. She is doing much more damage to our party by running to every media outlet she can flag down and arguing against impeaching a criminal President every day since this story broke than I can do by pointing it out. It’s not a “smear” to speak the truth and the truth is that Tulsi Gabbard is really not helping by trying to give cover for Trump.